ZEN Energy reveals "Big Battery" plans for South Australia

ZEN Energy reveals “Big Battery” plans for South Australia

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Adelaide-based ZEN Energy renews calls for electricity market rule changes as it reveals plans to develop a between 50-150MWh battery storage project in SA.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Adelaide-based energy storage specialist ZEN Energy has renewed calls for changes to Australia’s electricity market rules to fast-track the rollout of grid-scale battery storage, as it reveals plans to develop a 50-150MWh project on the South Australian network, to support its proposed large-scale solar farms.

ZEN – which has graduated from the backyard of founder Richard Turner to being Australia’s first dedicated community renewable energy provider, chaired by University of Melbourne economics professor Ross Garnuat – has recently turned its attention to large-scale solar projects that will operate alongside battery storage systems to service large-scale electricity users.

A grid-scale battery plant in Ontario, Canada, installed by ZEN’s US sister company, Greensmith.

The company said on Wednesday that it had been working on a major proposal for South Australia – dubbed the Big Battery Project – exploring the potential for between 50-150MW of battery storage in Port Augusta.

Garnaut and his team briefed the SA Labor government on the company’s plans earlier this week, and the multiple benefits such projects could offer by stabilising electricity supply in the region and driving down wholesale prices.

In a conversation with RenewEconomy on Friday, Garnaut said his company – alongside its sister company, US battery maker Greensmith, which was behind around 40 per cent of America’s installed battery capacity in 2016, and recently completed a 95MWh project in California – had been working on the Big Battery project over the last 15 months, to find the appropriate sizing of power and the optimal balance between power and energy.

He said the team had found that a 50MW battery, with half an hour of stored energy, would be enough to provide the kind of frequency control and ancillary services (FCAS) SA needs as it transitions away from coal power and into renewables.

A 100MWh battery, he said, would go a substantial way towards providing a buffer against surges of peak loads in extreme heat events, like this month’s heatwave, which resulted in 90,000 households and businesses temporarily losing supply.

A 150MWh battery, meanwhile, would meet the state’s needs for fast frequency response, or synthetic inertia, stabilising grid frequency and voltage at times of sudden loss of power, such as that which triggered the state-wide blackout on September 28, 2016.

But, as Garnaut has also told the Weatherill government, the development of projects like this hinge on the reform of a number of weaknesses in the regulatory framework of the NEM that skew it in favour of fossil fuel generation.

Chief among these, Garnaut told RE, are the absence of a competitive market for fast response frequency control of the kind that batteries are ideally placed to provide.

Another big hurdle, he adds, is the averaging of settlement prices of wholesale energy contracts over half hour periods, when buyers and sellers bid for power in 5 minute blocks. The fossil fuel industry, as we have reported, have argued fiercely against these changes.

Of course, ZEN is not the only company – or energy industry player – pushing for this particular rule change.

As we reported here last June, a “battle royale” over control of energy markets has been brewing in Australia for some time now, led by battery storage developers and some small energy retailers – zinc smelter operator Sun Metals is the main industry proponent of the rule change.

Efforts to change these rules are seen as an opportunity to wrest control from big, bulky, slow-response generators – who have not been averse to gaming the market and artificially driving up prices – and encourage smarter, smaller, fast-response distributed generation.

Garnaut says he has no doubt that these regulatory weaknesses will be eventually removed, but notes that the speed of their removal will be crucial to the security of Australian electricity supply in the near future.

Meanwhile, ZEN Energy will continue to work on its portfolio of diversified renewables and storage, which it says can provide secure power, on a 24-hour basis at lower cost than the conventional alternatives.

In particular, Garnaut notes that the company’s battery project would have two revenue streams, one in the FCAS markets and one in the wholesale power markets.

And the greater the volatility in wholesale markets as coal plants like Port Augusta’s Northern and Victoria’s Hazelwood are shuttered – and the higher the electricity prices – the greater the need and opportunity for large-scale batteries, he said.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

  1. Kevfromspace 4 years ago

    This is some really exciting and groundbreaking stuff. On the AEMC website it appears they have delayed the final decision on the proposed rule changes around settlement periods AGAIN.

    • Alastair Leith 4 years ago

      Well AEMO is 40% owned by the market members, what about AEMC, arms length from fossils, when no other part of the industry is? Doubt it.

  2. Jon 4 years ago

    It will be interesting to see what they have in mind. It is very difficult to make a business case for a utility scale battery based on FCAS and energy arbitrage. A inertia market, such as that suggested by AGL would provide further revenue streams for batteries and improve the business case.

    • FeFiFoFum 4 years ago

      Add ‘Capacity Credits’ and maybe its starting to look viable ?
      Has anyone got an idea of the rate payable for FCAS ?

      Last time I looked at this it was suggested that the market was not yet finalised for generators to be able to bid to supply FCAS, and it was only the two largest generators connected to the grid that could supply this service. Whether they were paid to supply this was also an unknown. This is in WA btw.

  3. brucelee 4 years ago

    While additional risk would have to be taken, could they just build it and then capitalise on the next 14000/MWh event to pay it off? After that just undercut the gas turbines EVERY single time.

    • Alastair Leith 4 years ago

      As stated in the article, the problem is the bid/settle anomaly reduces the income from FRAS to a sixth of what they bid in a five minute period.

      • brucelee 4 years ago

        Makes sense but I’m talking about now, before the 5 min

        • Alastair Leith 4 years ago

          Depends if you are talking about the FFR market or the supply market, two different things, two different markets.

  4. M.L.Sachdeva 4 years ago

    The Battery Storage is mentioned to cater for system frequency variation during peak demand and frequency variation and voltage sag during loss of generation.
    The life of battery depends on the nos of charging / discharging cycle and depth of discharge as also annual loss/ damage to the cells during life of battery. The success of Storage battery system would depend upon incidences of frequency variation occurring in a day and the time the battery remains connected to network to meet the load. The load cycle has to be precisely forecast and is based on large nos of variants.The battery system controls shall be suitable to react to speed of system variation similar to that provided with conventional generators.

    Loss of generation is generally unpredictable and system operator knows system load and generation capacity and earmark the largest gen unit as spinning reserve to take care of loss of generation. The storage battery to cater for planned loss of generation may be uneconomical. The Storage Battery may be capable to meet a limited generation loss but this will also depend on the type and length of network (O/H or Cable) and predominantly reactive or capacitive load.

Comments are closed.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.