Tasmania rooftop solar worth three times current tariff: report

Tasmania rooftop solar worth three times current tariff: report

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Report says Tasmania rooftop solar power worth nearly 3x what it’s currently valued at, and this is stopping growth that could bolster energy security.

share
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

As near-record rainfalls deliver Tasmania from a months-long energy crisis, a new report has emerged suggesting that the solar power generated on the state’s rooftops is being seriously undervalued – and that this is holding back the growth of an industry that could bolster energy security and reduce reliance on back-up gas and diesel generators.

The research, released on Friday by the Tasmanian Renewable Energy Alliance (TREA) and Solar Citizens, shows that power generated from rooftop solar in Tasmania is worth between 17-22c/kWh once health and climate benefits are factored in – around three times more than the current price.

20130305-_IGP6486

Currently, Tasmania’s solar households receive 6.1c/kWh for the solar they export, but pay around 25c/kWh for electricity from the grid, which is mostly sourced from hydropower, but when dam levels fall too low – as they did for the first four months of this year – is generated by gas and diesel, or imported from mainland brown coal plants, when the link to the mainland is working.

In March, the state’s energy minister Matthew Groom hinted that the state’s feed-in tariff may be lifted to try to encourage more rooftop solar and help offset the high cost of diesel generation, which has pushed wholesale prices up to 60c/kWh on some occasions.

TREA and Solar Citizens are now calling on Groom to do just that, and to factor in all of the benefits a high penetration of rooftop solar would bring to the state.

To date, the state’s approach to valuing residential solar has been messy and confounding, culminating in a draft report from the Tasmanian Economic Regulator that recommended little change to the current feed-in tariff.

As TREA chief Jack Gilding wrote here in February, the report did little but demonstrate Tasmania’s “remarkable ability to ignore the challenge of energy security… the changes facing the electricity industry nationally, and the global climate emergency.”

While it acknowledged that solar PV could increase energy security when dams were low, because solar PV supplied only 1 per cent of Tasmanian electricity demand in 2014-15, the report suggested this benefit could be excluded from the FiT calculation.

In stark contrast, the Victorian Essential Services Commission has recently released a report arguing that the price for exported solar should be increased to account for environmental benefits and benefits brought to the grid.

“This is a self-defeating cycle,” Gilding wrote. “Solar PV could meet much more of Tasmania’s energy needs, but until the full benefit is recognised, there will be no incentive for solar owners to invest in feeding energy into the grid.”

In a statement on Friday, Gilding reiterated this point, in the hope the state government will intervene before the Regulator publishes a final solar rate for 2016-2017 that is far below its true value.

“The current price paid to solar households is simply unfair, and it’s holding back Tasmania’s solar industry.

“Grid electricity costs 25c whilst Hydro Tasmania is generating electricity from gas and diesel, sometimes at a cost of between 17 and 30c,” he said.



“A fair price for solar would give Tasmania’s solar industry the boost it desperately needs and would lift jobs, improve energy resilience, provide a fair rate of return and create clean, healthy communities,” said Claire O’Rourke, National Director with Solar Citizens.

“Tasmanians need their government to see the big picture and take decisive action on supporting renewable energy,” said Gilding.

“Burning diesel and gas, praying for rain and importing dirty Victorian electricity is not an acceptable response to Tasmania’s energy situation.”

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

10 Comments
  1. Ian 5 years ago

    The resistance tasmania’s encombants have for solar and wind seems very strange. You can understand coal’s resistance to the effects of high penetrance of solar on the network as coal best functions at a constant and steady output. But why the similar resistance from hydro in Tasmania? Hydro is eminently dispatchable and the storage of water is still there whether hydro electricity is produced constantly or in variable quantities. If the approx 200 000 households produce on average 3 KW each that is only 1/2 the usual output of hydro and only for a few hours in the day. If anything, a very high penetrance of solar will only enhance the arbitrage value of hydro.

    • Barri Mundee 5 years ago

      In fact greater solar capacity would allow hydro resources to be conserved at times when sunny. Same deal with greater wind capacity.

      • Ian 5 years ago

        Exactly, using large quantities of solar and wind, when these resources are available would conserve water in the hydro dams for the times when sun and wind are not available. Hydro would then be the generating capacity of last resort and thus be more valuable. If the Basslink ever gets repaired, Tasmania’s hydro could then be exported to Victoria in greater quantities to take advantage of the times when the mainland’s prices are high. Victoria could have available 1 GW 24/7 of dispatchable hydro- the equivalent of 150 000 tesla power-walls (worth, by the way, $1.5 billion !)

  2. Peggy Fisher 5 years ago

    I also don’t understand why Tasmanians are not arguing fiercely for a price on carbon.
    It would put all their manufacturing at an immediate advantage, as their electricity is almost all carbon free.

    • heinbloed 5 years ago

      Carbon is emitted by burning fossil fuels, motoring/transport would have then to be taxed as well.
      An uproar on an island would be the consequence, similar to the UK and Ireland, Cyprus,Malta … in Europe.
      All try to stop the carbon tax blaming their isolated geographical situation.

      Imagine fun-polluters had to pay for the damage they cause, they could, would …..

      http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/may/21/the-worlds-largest-cruise-ship-and-its-supersized-pollution-problem

      • neroden 5 years ago

        Electric cars. Roughly one Supercharger would allow Teslas to cover the whole of Tasmania.

        • eddierothmanisatool 5 years ago

          i dont think so. its more like 5. but i take your point.

          • RobS 5 years ago

            A single supercharger at Perth would enable trips from Smithton to Hobart via the Bass and Midland highways this includes all trips from Burnie, Devonport, and Launceston to Hobart. This represents a huge proportion of Tasmanian driving. Sure a few more would be open up a few other routes, particularly the east and west coast tourist routes, but I agree with Neroden, a single central supercharger would facilitate a huge fraction of all Tasmanian road trips.

        • Charles 5 years ago

          One would cover any travel between Devonport, Launceston and Hobart. Two would cover about 90% of the population and five would be get you 100% coverage.

      • Barri Mundee 5 years ago

        There were no call for motoring etc to be taxed when the carbon price was in force. Tasmania’s power generators benefited as their hydro is very low emissions. So I agree with Peggy.

Comments are closed.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.