Netherlands to close all coal-fired generation by 2030

Netherlands to close all coal-fired generation by 2030

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Netherlands decision to close coal plants include those only completed in 2015 – the phase-out combines with rise of renewables and the impact of improved efficiency that put old models at risk.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email



In announcing plans to shut all coal-fired power plants by 2030,  the new government of the Netherlands sent a dramatic signal to electricity markets today that no investment in coal-fired power in Europe is safe.

The Dutch statement is especially significant given that the Netherlands itself has only recently commissioned three of Europe’s newest coal-fired power plants, all completed in 2015.

The coalition-pact policy directive also states, importantly, that the government will introduce a binding target to cut carbon emissions by 2030 to put a floor under carbon prices.

No investment European in coal-fired generation is safe.

The Netherlands already presents a stark case to investors in new coal-fired generation in Europe —and further afield—in the massive write-downs Dutch utilities have made on the country’s three new coal plants.

Those write-downs, to around half the original value of the plants, indicate that the utilities affected, Engie, RWE and Uniper, will not make money on the investments in question.

The impairments reflect the impact of massive growth in renewable power in neighbouring Germany, which has depressed wholesale power prices, and the utilities having failed to foresee flat or falling electricity demand.

The Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA) published a report last yeardocumenting how the three utilities had logged underpublicized impairments collectively worth billions of euros on the new power plants.

The report (“The Dutch Coal Mistake: How Three Brand-New Power Plants in the Netherlands Are at Risk Already of Becoming Stranded Assets”) concluded that political and market trends would drive valuations even lower.

Today’s announcement highlights the risk of investing in either new or existing coal-fired power, and the lesson is clear: National coal phase-out plans such as this, combined with the rise of renewables and the impact on demand of improved efficiency, put old electricity-production models at risk.

Significantly, the Dutch news highlights the risks associated with costly environmental upgrades of existing coal-fired power plants to comply with recently revised pollution standards to be implemented from 2021 on.

The new standards will require coal power plants across the European Union to meet tougher limits for emissions of mercury, nitrogen dioxide, and sulfur dioxide, some of the most dangerous air pollutants.

Where power plants presently exceed the limits, utilities will have to decide whether to close those plants or invest in upgrades, a risky approach given that coal phase-outs will very likely cut short the opportunity for operators to recoup their investment on life extension upgrades.

Utilities will do well now to consider carefully whether to upgrade older and more polluting coal power plants or focus instead on more forward-looking, high-return investments, such as in digitalization, customer services and renewables.

Source: IEEFA. Reproduced with permission.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

  1. George Darroch 3 years ago

    Bye coal.

    I don’t pity any fool who invests in coal in 2017, whether in Australia or elsewhere. (Or even those still holding coal-based assets who haven’t sold them down.)

    • Joe 3 years ago

      The Dutch getting out of Coal by 2030….thats 20 years ahead of Andy V and his AGL crowd. But The Dutch decision should not really be so much of a surprise. The Urgenda Foundation won a ‘climate court case’ in 2015 against The Dutch Government.

    • Joe 3 years ago

      Where everyone else has said no, it is looking like China maybe the ones to bankroll Adani / Carmichael Mega Mine environmental abomination. Which sort of goes against what China is doing at home in going easy on Coal and going hard on RE. The air pollution problem in China is huge incentive for them to exit Coal.

  2. Andrew Roydhouse 3 years ago

    Speaking of coal-fired plants – Why is it that Qld consistently seems to run its coal fired plants at low capacity and its more expensive (to operate) gas-fired plants at high capacity?

    As of this post nearly 1,100 MW of gas to just under 5,600 MW of coal-fired….

    and its wholesale power price has been consistently double that of Tas, Vic or SA over the last month or so.

    Must be those evil wind and large-scale solar plants operating in Qld – oh, that’s right, there aren’t any.

    • Malcolm M 3 years ago

      Several of Queensland’s coal plants are out of action, most likely for maintenance because September to November usually represent the months of low demand. The units out of action include Kogan Creek (744 MW), Tarong 3 (350 MW) and Gladstone3 (280 MW). Thy Wivenhoe pumped storage hydro has been in regular use to make up for the lack of coal-fired generation.

      • Ren Stimpy 3 years ago

        Thanks. The Murdoch media, talkback ranters and irrefutable Outsiders had led me to believe that all coal plants operate at full capacity 24-7/365. I guess they’re not so irrefutable after all, and I’ll have to adjust my assumptions accordingly.

    • Matt 3 years ago

      I’m not sure if this is the normal trend but I noticed for a few months now generally all power flows to VIC.

      QLD -> NSW.
      NSW -> VIC.
      SA -> VIC.
      TAS -> VIC.

      Sometimes of course it reverses here and there but generally this is what I see. Found that interesting. And the CO2 output goes best to worst – TAS, SA, VIC, NSW, QLD. Again, power prices seem to be cheapest in TAS, then SA, VIC, NSW, QLD. I could be wrong about how normal this is but this is what I see on Electricity Map website.

  3. Malcolm M 3 years ago

    The right wing in Australia decry “sovereign risk” for any such intervention by government, claiming that it will deter further foreign investment, and make Australia like a third world country. But here is an example of a first world country taking such action. The taint goes follows coal rather than the country.

Comments are closed.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.